News

Despite there being patients who struggle to get access to their complete health records, their data often is shared with insurance companies, pharmacies and big tech without them even knowing, according to Kenneth Mandl, MD, and Eric Perakslis, PhD.

As expressed above, while there is broad acknowledgment of the merits of the Proposed Rules goals, as expressed by several commenters, there are significant concerns with the complexity that is added by the rule and the general issues related to overlapping regimes created by various departments/agencies with HHS. By way of example, OCR has created definitions for PHA and EHR and expanded individual access rights; however, the Interoperability Rules attempted to create standards regarding such access through references to the United States Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI). If the Proposed Rule is finalized, entities will be required to navigate multiple layers of overlapping and potentially conflicting regulations.A second key issue is the impact of state laws on the Proposed Rule and other regulations being issued by HHS pursuant to the Regulatory Sprint to Coordinated Care. Since HIPAA does not pre-empt state law that is more protective of PHI, health care providers and other covered entities need to examine to what extent they will be able to rely on the more liberal disclosure requirements around coordinated care if such disclosures are restricted by state law. Several states such as California and New York have more restrictive laws that may prohibit such disclosures.

The paper explains and illustrates basic principles and scenarios around sharing with patients, including patients third-party apps. Doctors routinely and legally share health data electronically under HIPAA whether or not their organizations retain HIPAA responsibility. Sharing with patients and patients third-party apps is no different and should be just as routine.

Cyberattacks are up, in fact security experts said 66% of health care companies cannot meet the minimum security standard defined by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.“The problem is we have an industry with a rapidly growing technical debt,” said Caleb Barlow, CEO, Cynergistek. “Its not that they arent investing in security, they are, they just arent investing fast enough to keep up with an ever moving adversary.“Barlow’s company, Cynergistek, works with healthcare systems before and after a cyber-attack happens. An HHS report on healthcare security listed the vulnerabilities in hospitals. They named networks without tight controls, how records are disposed of, the use of personal devices and working from home.Too often you dont see multi factor authentication in place. Many of us are familiar with that where you log in with a password, but you also have to get a challenger response on your phone,” said Barlow.That extra step can keep cyber criminals out of the network. Scripps Health is saying very little about its security measures and only issued a written statement saying the network outage was caused by malware. But they havent said how that happened.CBS 8 has learned that the cyber attack took all Scripps hospitals out of the emergency medical response system on May 2 when a boat capsized off Point Loma.Scripps Memorial Hospital in La Jolla was the closest trauma center to the incident, yet patients were sent to other area hospitals.Its the kind of disruption cyber criminals want.Its always unsettling, when you hear your security has been breached, because you dont know what information they might use it,” said Lisa Kendall, patient.Kendalls daughters appointment was cancelled and like so many others, shes forced to reschedule it. But the lack of information from Scripps Health is leaving many with questions.I dont know what to do about it, other than just make sure Im following my credit monitoring apps and make sure no one is trying to get our information, but I feel helpless” said Kendall.WATCH: Scripps Health hack forcing appointments to be canceled and moreRelated ArticlesScripps Health hack forcing appointments to be canceled and moreCalifornia hospitals given leeway to use last resort staffing waivers, analysis showsSome patients from deadly Imperial County crash treated in San DiegoAd Unmuteby TaboolaSponsored LinksYou May LikeForget the 30yr mortgage if you owe less than $356K. (Do this instead)LowerMyBills NMLS#167283; 33064 Sisters Take The Same Picture For 40 Years. Don’t Cry When You See The Last One!Past FactoryWhy not switch to a 15-Year Mortgage if you owe less than $356K? (Evaluate options.)Quicken Loans NMLS#3030Best Cash Back Credit Cards of 2021NerdWalletLove Your Dog? Get a Coupon for BLUE Pet FoodBlue Buffalo

Theres no master patient identifier to ensure all your records are linked back to you, says Dr. Harlan Krumholz, a cardiologist and director of the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation at the Yale School of Medicine. The only way to ensure you have all your health records, he says, is to compile them yourself.

And of course, every individual interaction with the healthcare system touches lots of different data repositories, few of which are integrated:

Now providers must also deliver it in a more patient-friendly platform.If they do not, another provider in-person or virtual is ready to step in and fill the void, he added.

US healthcare organisations may choose to comply with the rule in a way that helps ensure patients know about their enhanced right to access and use their health information for empowerment and engagement, or they may simply keep quiet about it and hope patients dont notice their new rights. Choosing to keep quiet would be a mistake. Full sharing and transparency of personal health information should strengthen patient-clinician communication, raise health literacy, promote self-management, enhance teamwork, and increase trust. Patients voices must now be put at the centre of discussions and debates about information and data sharing in healthcare to ensure that all reap the benefits of the digital age.

Tripathi and Posnack explained that for the next 18 months, the information that can’t be “blocked” is limited to the data elements represented in the United States Core Data for Interoperability.“This initial 18-month period and limited scope gives the regulated community time to grow more experienced with the information blocking regulation, including when and how to meet an ‘exception,’ before the full scope of the regulations EHI definition comes into effect,” they wrote.